Full list of Republicans who voted against new Social Security benefits

On By Littum

The House of Representatives voted to increase Social Security benefits for millions of Americans this week with a bipartisan majority, but a significant number of Republicans voted against the measure to help retirees and their spouses get full benefits.

The Social Security Fairness Act was approved by the House by a vote of 327-75 on Tuesday, effectively eliminating the unexpected elimination provision (WEP) and the government pension offset (GPO).

Historically, both of these have lowered monthly Social Security payments for public employees, police officers, firefighters, teachers and their spouses, based on the pensions they receive along with Social Security.

More from the Newsweek Vault: Latest Social Security news: 2025 COLA announcement and upcoming changes to your benefits

“Educators who do not earn Social Security in public schools, but who work part-time or in the summer in jobs covered by Social Security, have reduced benefits even if they pay into the system for enough quarters to receive benefits,” said the bill’s co . sponsors, GOP Rep. Garret Graves of Louisiana and Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia, in a statement.

Social security
People leave the Social Security Administration building in Burbank, Calif., on Nov. 5, 2020. This week, the House voted to expand Social Security benefits for those receiving pensions.

VALERIE MACON/AFP via Getty Images

About 3 million Americans are affected by WEP and GPO combined. If the Senate also passes the Social Security Fairness Act and President Joe Biden signs it, those millions could see significantly higher monthly benefits.

More from the Newsweek Vault: Will the election of Donald Trump in 2024 affect Social Security?

“This could mean slightly bigger checks for many people struggling with the rising cost of living, especially with rising grocery prices,” said Kevin Thompson, a financial expert and founder and CEO of 9i Capital Group. Newsweek. “This change would provide some relief to retirees feeling a pinch of inflation.”

While most House Democrats and 136 House Republicans voted to get rid of the WEP and GPO, 71 Republicans voted against the legislation:

  • Rick Allen (Georgia)
  • Jodey Arrington (Texas)
  • James Baird (Indiana)
  • Aaron Bean (Florida)
  • Cliff Bentz (Oregon)
  • Andy Biggs (Arizona)
  • Dan Bishop (North Carolina)
  • Josh Brecheen (Oklahoma)
  • Tim Burchett (Tennessee)
  • Eric Burlison (Missouri)
  • Kat Cammack (Florida)
  • Earl Carter (Georgia)
  • Ben Cline (Virginia)
  • Andrew S. Clyde (Georgia)
  • Mike Collins (Georgia)
  • Elijah Crane (Arizona)
  • Eric Crawford (Arkansas)
  • Dan Crenshaw (Texas)
  • Byron Donalds (Florida)
  • Jeff Duncan (South Carolina)
  • Neal Dunn (Florida)
  • Chuck Edwards (North Carolina)
  • Ron Estes (Kansas)
  • Scott Fitzgerald (Wisconsin)
  • Virginia Foxx (North Carolina)
  • Russell Fry (South Carolina)
  • Russ Fulcher (Idaho)
  • Bob Good (Virginia)
  • H. Morgan Griffith (Virginia)
  • Glenn Grothman (Wisconsin)
  • Andy Harris (Maryland)
  • Diana Harshbarger (Tennessee)
  • Kevin Hern (Oklahoma)
  • Wesley Hunt (Texas)
  • Darin LaHood (Illinois)
  • Greg Lopez (Colorado)
  • Barry Loudermilk (Georgia)
  • Nancy Mace (South Carolina)
  • Tracey Mann (Kansas)
  • Tom McClintock (California)
  • Richard McCormick (Georgia)
  • Mary Miller (Illinois)
  • Carol Miller (West Virginia)
  • John Moolenaar (Michigan)
  • Blake Moore (Utah)
  • Nathaniel Moran (Texas)
  • Gregory Murphy (North Carolina)
  • Ralph Norman (South Carolina)
  • Andrew Ogles (Tennessee)
  • Gary Palmer (Alabama)
  • Scott Perry (Pennsylvania)
  • John Rose (Tennessee)
  • Matthew Rosendale (Montana)
  • David Rouzer (North Carolina)
  • Chip Roy (Texas)
  • David Schweikert (Arizona)
  • Austin Scott (Georgia)
  • Keith Self (Texas)
  • Adrian Smith (Nebraska)
  • Lloyd Smucker (Pennsylvania)
  • Victoria Spartz (Indiana)
  • Elise Stefanik (New York)
  • Bryan Steil (Wisconsin)
  • W. Gregory Steube (Florida)
  • Thomas Tiffany (Wisconsin)
  • William Timmons (South Carolina)
  • Beth Van Duyne (Texas)
  • Bruce Westerman (Arkansas)
  • Joe Wilson (South Carolina)
  • Steve Womack (Arkansas)
  • Ryan Zinke (Montana)

The backlash against the bill centered on the law’s potential costs, which could further affect the Social Security Administration’s projected funding shortfall. Currently, the agency is expected to run out of money for full payments as early as 2035.

More from the Newsweek Vault: Online banks vs. Traditional Banks: Learn the Differences

If fully enacted, the Social Security Fairness Act is estimated to cost $196 billion over the next decade.

“We will accelerate the insolvency of the Social Security fund,” Jodey Arrington, a Republican from Texas, said on Tuesday. “We should be responsible for how we do this. We should consider retirees in every state, and we should consider future retirees.”

Some Democrats also voted against the Social Security Fairness Act because of these concerns.

“I’m proud to join them in the fight to repeal these unfair provisions, but it must be paid for responsibly to prevent automatic benefit cuts down the road,” Representative John Larsen, a Connecticut Democrat, said in a statement. “I could not vote for the bills on the floor tonight because they are not being paid for and therefore put Americans’ hard-earned benefits at risk.”